When Trump was President, and before, nobody batted an eye if someone questioned the results of an election. In fact, the last time any Republican won the Presidency without Dems calling it fraudulent takes us back to the election BEFORE Bill Clinton took office.
That’s a long time. But something changed in 2020. Suddenly, this was the ONE election that couldn’t be blamed on problems with voting irregularities, machine tampering, Russian meddling in our elections or whatever. The one with all massive changes to how the system is run, with mail-in ballots, ballot harvesting, Zuckerbucks, and all sorts of other goofiness was the ONE bulletproof election whose results MUST not be challenged.
We even coined a new word for anyone who doubted the validity or circumstances around Joe Biden’s ballot total. “Election-denier”. Any evidence brought forward to cast the smallest degree of doubt on the impartiality of the results got social media accounts shut down, advertisers scared away, and websites demonetized.
Will Donald Trump win the 2024 election?
Even Dinesh D’Souza’s 2000 Mules film barely moved the needle on this issue. Which is weird, because the exact issue at the heart of his 2000 Mules documentary became the basis of a Democrat primary result being thrown out by a Connecticut judge.
Since no Republicans had any skin in this game, it can’t even be framed as a GOP conspiracy. This was a blue-on-blue lawsuit… and here’s what was decided:
A state judge has taken the unusual step of ordering a new Democratic mayoral primary in Connecticut’s largest city to be held after the Nov. 7 general election is completed. The decision comes after surveillance videos showed a woman stuffing what appeared to be absentee ballots into an outdoor ballot box days before the original primary.
Superior Court Judge William Clark determined the allegations of possible malfeasance warrant throwing out the results of the Sept. 12 primary, which incumbent Bridgeport Mayor Joe Ganim won by 251 votes out of 8,173 cast. Absentee ballots secured his margin of victory.
“The volume of ballots so mishandled is such that it calls the result of the primary election into serious doubt and leaves the court unable to determine the legitimate result of the primary,” Clark wrote in his ruling, adding that the videos “are shocking to the court and should be shocking to all the parties.” — FoxNews
Absentee ballots? Being misused to rig an election result?
Footage showed Wanda Geter-Pataky, vice chair of the Bridgeport Democratic Town Committee and operations specialist for the city, and Eneida Martinez, a former City Council member stuffing ballot dropboxes.pic.twitter.com/3IoVGrwo6L
— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) November 2, 2023
Eric here makes an observation we need to pay VERY close attention to in both past and future elections.
A new addition to the American History of Voter Fraud?
A Bridgeport CT ballot harvester + stuffer saying "I got your back mayor"
The woman seen on video making multiple trips to the ballot boxes in the city.
+ 900 more Absentee ballots than Absentee voters on record pic.twitter.com/QgqIabGc3G
— Eric Abbenante (@EricAbbenante) October 30, 2023
Any discrepancy in the number of absentee ballots — especially when they are OVER — should get your Spidey Senses tingling.